Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video14 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hoover Institution results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 42 faulty-reasoning hits from 14 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,827 of 28,364 speakers). This Hoover Institution is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Hoover Institution
Speaker details
Total words: 14
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos14 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos