Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Holly Lawford-Smith results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,815 of 28,364 speakers). This Holly Lawford-Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Holly Lawford-Smith
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠94%Holly Lawford-Smith (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

A Crisis in the Humanities⁠40%
Quillette⁠64%By Paul Boghossian⁠61%7/15/2026, 6:01:45 PM