Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video43.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hilary Benn results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 203 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,850 of 28,364 speakers). This Hilary Benn is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Hilary Benn
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 43.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos43.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos