Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video122.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hesham Alghannam results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Begging the Question, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 76.1% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 254 faulty-reasoning hits from 122.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,511 of 28,364 speakers). This Hesham Alghannam is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Hesham Alghannam
Speaker details
Total words: 122.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos122.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 76.1%76.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 76.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos