Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helen Long results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 86.5% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 319 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,531 of 28,364 speakers). This Helen Long is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Helen Long
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
41.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 72.9%72.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 86.5%86.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.5%36.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 86.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 72.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos