Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heidi Daniel results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 53.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,809 of 28,364 speakers). This Heidi Daniel is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Heidi Daniel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.4%29.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 30.9%30.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos