Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather Sudweeks results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Composition/Division, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 42.072 hits. Analysis detected 184.072 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,208 of 28,364 speakers). This Heather Sudweeks is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Heather Sudweeks
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
24.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.5%46.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos