Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video30.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather Dressler results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 94.7% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 30.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (10,787 of 25,889 speakers). This Heather Dressler is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Heather Dressler
Speaker details
Total words: 30.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
41.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos30.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 94.7%94.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 94.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos