Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video94 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 146 faulty-reasoning hits from 94 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,056 of 28,364 speakers). This Heather is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Heather
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 94
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos94 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.2%21.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos