Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hatem Abudayyeh results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 84.2% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 491 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,233 of 28,364 speakers). This Hatem Abudayyeh is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Hatem Abudayyeh
Speaker details
Total words: 123
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
50.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos123 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 75.5%75.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 84.2%84.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 46.8%46.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 46.8%46.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 46.8%46.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 84.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 75.5%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 46.8%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 46.8%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 46.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos