Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hasan Ghashghavi results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 45.9% saturation with 46.802 hits. Analysis detected 110.802 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,258 of 28,364 speakers). This Hasan Ghashghavi is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Hasan Ghashghavi
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.6% percentile
18.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 45.9%45.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 45.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos