Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video87 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hanora results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Overconfidence Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 59.8% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 143 faulty-reasoning hits from 87 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,910 of 28,364 speakers). This Hanora is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Hanora
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 87
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
32.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos87 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 59.8%59.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 40.2%40.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.1%16.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 59.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos