Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video70.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Spungen results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 235 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,486 of 28,364 speakers). This Hannah Spungen is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Hannah Spungen
Speaker details
Total words: 70.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 21.3%21.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 21.3%21.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos