Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Flath results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Bandwagon, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 85.2% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 552 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,298 of 25,860 speakers). This Hannah Flath is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Hannah Flath
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
53.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 85.2%85.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 85.2%85.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 70.4%70.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 70.4%70.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 35.2%35.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.8%14.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 85.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 85.2%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos