Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamza Chaudhry results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 70.9% saturation with 58.11 hits. Analysis detected 185.11 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,280 of 28,364 speakers). This Hamza Chaudhry is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Hamza Chaudhry
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
42.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 70.9%70.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.1%29.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 70.9%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos