Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video21 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamidreza Afarideh results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 21 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,736 of 28,364 speakers). This Hamidreza Afarideh is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Hamidreza Afarideh
Speaker details
Total words: 21
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos21 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos