Speaker summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Halsel results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 60.6% saturation with 70.875 hits . Analysis detected 275.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.4% and a BS Rank of 40% (17,198 of 28,364 speakers). This Halsel is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Halsel
Speaker details
Total words: 104
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.4% percentile 24.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos104 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 60.6% 60.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 34.6% 34.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 40.4% 40.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 30.8% 30.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 18.3% 18.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Optimism Bias: Speaker 60.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 34.6%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst