Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gwen Frankton results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 321.86 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,283 of 28,364 speakers). This Gwen Frankton is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Gwen Frankton
Speaker details
Total words: 148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.5% percentile
18.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos148 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 12.2%12.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.4%19.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 6.0%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos