Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video49.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gustavo Alfaro results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 160.77 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,640 of 28,364 speakers). This Gustavo Alfaro is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Gustavo Alfaro
Speaker details
Total words: 49.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
17.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 26.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 0.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos