Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GSDF and fire authorities results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,636 of 26,780 speakers). This GSDF and fire authorities is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
GSDF and fire authorities
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos