Speaker summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grian Serrano results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Confirmation Bias , and Personal Incredulity , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 130 hits . Analysis detected 872.303 faulty-reasoning hits from 225 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,037 of 28,364 speakers). This Grian Serrano is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Grian Serrano
Speaker details
Total words: 225
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 10.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos225 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 26.4% 26.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 15.4% 15.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 15.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst