Speaker summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 280 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Roberts results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 55 hits . Analysis detected 355.83 faulty-reasoning hits from 280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,406 of 28,364 speakers). This Greg Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Greg Roberts
Speaker details
Total words: 280
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 7.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos280 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 16.8% 16.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst