Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video832.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Jackson results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 174.382 hits. Analysis detected 1,360.792 faulty-reasoning hits from 832.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (25,530 of 26,155 speakers). This Greg Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Greg Jackson
Speaker details
Total words: 832.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.4% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos832.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos