Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos42.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grady Judd results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ad Hominem, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,682 of 28,364 speakers). This Grady Judd is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Grady Judd
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠95%Grady Judd (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 42.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510094.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos42.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos