Speaker summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Huffman-Gottschling results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 61.6% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 764.272 faulty-reasoning hits from 377 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,287 of 28,364 speakers). This Grace Huffman-Gottschling is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Grace Huffman-Gottschling
Speaker details
Total words: 377
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
16.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos377 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 61.6%61.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.0%17.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.6%18.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 61.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos