Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government of Canada results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, False Dilemma, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 62.7% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 121 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,478 of 28,364 speakers). This Government of Canada is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Government of Canada
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
47.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 62.8%62.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 62.8%62.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 37.3%37.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 62.8%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 62.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos