Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glenda Gilmore results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,646 of 28,364 speakers). This Glenda Gilmore is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Glenda Gilmore
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
25.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.3%26.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos