Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glaucia dos Santos results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 85.6% saturation with 44.097 hits. Analysis detected 169.097 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,339 of 28,364 speakers). This Glaucia dos Santos is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Glaucia dos Santos
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
48.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 85.6%85.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.8%28.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 85.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos