Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video361.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gio Orantes results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Nature, and Self-Serving Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 655.7 faulty-reasoning hits from 361.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,017 of 28,364 speakers). This Gio Orantes is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Gio Orantes
Speaker details
Total words: 361.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos361.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 11.4%11.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.9%6.9%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos