Speaker summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gil Guerra results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 179 faulty-reasoning hits from 292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,871 of 28,364 speakers). This Gil Guerra is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Gil Guerra
Speaker details
Total words: 292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos292 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos