Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video9 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Foreman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 9 hits. Analysis detected 45 faulty-reasoning hits from 9 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,496 of 25,709 speakers). This George Foreman is worse (more manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group.
George Foreman
Speaker details
Total words: 9
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510094.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos9 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos