Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video242.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geno Auriemma results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Straw Man, and Unattributed Quote, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 443.592 faulty-reasoning hits from 242.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (25,093 of 26,491 speakers). This Geno Auriemma is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Geno Auriemma
Speaker details
Total words: 242.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos242.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos