Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gemma Sharp results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 224 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,668 of 28,364 speakers). This Gemma Sharp is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Gemma Sharp
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
21.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos132 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.2%18.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 8.1%Straw Man: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos