Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garrett Stubbs results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 69.035 hits. Analysis detected 233.604 faulty-reasoning hits from 209 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,612 of 28,364 speakers). This Garrett Stubbs is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Garrett Stubbs
Speaker details
Total words: 209
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos209 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos