Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gamal Abdel Nasser results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,562 of 28,364 speakers). This Gamal Abdel Nasser is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Gamal Abdel Nasser
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510094.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Reshaping the Middle East⁠74%
Quillette⁠64%By Shany Mor⁠84%7/12/2026, 5:31:58 PM