Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video45.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabriella McIntyre results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 45.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,853 of 28,364 speakers). This Gabriella McIntyre is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Gabriella McIntyre
Speaker details
Total words: 45.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.8% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos