Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos96.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabriel Boric results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Composition/Division, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.1% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 96.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,629 of 28,364 speakers). This Gabriel Boric is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Gabriel Boric
Speaker details
Total words: 96.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
30.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos96.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.1%66.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.2%32.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.9%33.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.1%16.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos