Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fulton Armstrong results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 748.205 faulty-reasoning hits from 252 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,847 of 28,364 speakers). This Fulton Armstrong is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Fulton Armstrong
Speaker details
Total words: 252
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.4% percentile
10.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos252 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 25.5%25.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 11.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos