Speaker summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos46.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Freedom of the Press Foundation results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 72.2% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 72.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,726 of 28,364 speakers). This Freedom of the Press Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Freedom of the Press Foundation
Speaker details
Total words: 46.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
72.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos46.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 72.2%72.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 72.2%72.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 72.2%72.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 72.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 72.2%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 72.2%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos