Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Freddie results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Genetic Fallacy, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 162.236 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,777 of 28,364 speakers). This Freddie is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Freddie
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 138
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
13.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos138 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos