Speaker summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francisco Domenech results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 71.3% saturation with 149.625 hits. Analysis detected 510.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 210 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (12,356 of 25,889 speakers). This Francisco Domenech is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Francisco Domenech
Speaker details
Total words: 210
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
34.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos210 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 82.0%82.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 71.3%71.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 82.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 71.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos