Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video73.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francisco Abarrio results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Overconfidence Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,481 of 28,364 speakers). This Francisco Abarrio is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Francisco Abarrio
Speaker details
Total words: 73.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
28.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 31.6%31.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos