Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video97 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forrest McDonald results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 82.5% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 97 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 82.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (5,092 of 28,364 speakers). This Forrest McDonald is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Forrest McDonald
Speaker details
Total words: 97
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
82.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos97 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 82.5%82.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos