Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FoodNet results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Special Pleading and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,473 of 28,364 speakers). This FoodNet is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
FoodNet
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510094.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Special Pleading: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos