Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flatbush Scoop results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,830 of 28,364 speakers). This Flatbush Scoop is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Flatbush Scoop
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos