Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fire Systems Inc. results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Self-Serving Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,829 of 28,364 speakers). This Fire Systems Inc. is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Fire Systems Inc.
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos