Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These fire managers results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,028 of 28,364 speakers). This fire managers is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
fire managers
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 75.6%75.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.6%75.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.4%24.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 75.6%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos