Speaker summary
⁠80%5 analyzed articles/videos1,729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fin Gomez results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 264.947 hits. Analysis detected 3,777.714 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,729 analyzed words across 5 videos, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (26,131 of 26,979 speakers). This Fin Gomez is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Fin Gomez
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 1,729
Video count: 5
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
5.5% BS Score5 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos