Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fin results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,856 of 28,364 speakers). This Fin is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Fin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 190
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
15.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos190 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.6%52.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.2%24.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.5%10.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos