Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video37.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fentrice Driskell results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,089 of 26,155 speakers). This Fentrice Driskell is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Fentrice Driskell
Speaker details
Total words: 37.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos